Looks so Real it must be Photoshopped

The contradictory title speaks volumes in France where they have recently enforced a law that requires photos that have been photoshopped, edited or retouched in any way MUST be labelled so. It would also require models to received a note from their doctors, saying that they are not dangerously thin before even being considered for a job. They enacted the law back in 2015, as an effort to combat anorexia and other forms of body dysmorphia; which became an increasingly prevalent issue in today’s society.

As of October 2nd this year, any company or brand that do not comply with these laws will be fined $44,100 or 30% of the cost of the advertising. Some would say it is a fitting price to pay for not complying with the law but I would argue that it is not enough, given the multitude of edited images we are bombarded with every day. Our obsession with looking perfect and seeming perfect has now affected how we interact on social media, where 57% of Australian women surveyed by the Syndey Morning Herald admit they have retouched their photos.

Good Effort

Australia has only tried but not in the same way France’s health minister has. Australia, back in 2010, had only suggested a voluntary “code of conduct” in the fashion industry to refrain from retouching photos. A far cry from the achievement that France can boast about today. How shameful it is that a progressive country like ours, compels 75% of women to feel ‘unattractive’, ‘ugly’ or ‘too fat’. Not only are we behind in technological advances and educational-revamping but we are now, falling behind in being socially responsible. It is not enough Australia, and guess who is paying for the short-comings of our health minister; you guessed it – every single one of us.

source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17j5QzF3kqE
Body Evolution: Model Before and After Photoshop

Here is a hypothetical scenario:

What would happen if Australia also enforced a law like this?

We would soon then see that all advertisement campaigns, celebrity social media accounts and digital media to be covered with red flags labelled “retouched photo”. I wonder how much liberation there will be when that happens. We are already living a post-body mindset era, where plus-size models like Ashley Graham and Iskra are seen on runways that originally saw 0 sized models. It is time that Australia caught up.

The pinnacle Question

But again we are here to discuss the effects of such legislation on our practices as digital marketers. Which industries would be heavily affected by this change besides the fashion industry and what kind of marketing implications would we need to consider before posting a photo of our products online?

One of my many answers to this question: FOOD. The number of times I have gone to buy food from somewhere and it looks nothing like the advertisement or menu item that I saw. Looking at you McDonalds, Hungry Jacks and KFC.

Advertisements

The perfect album for wherever you go

What if you could go to a certain place in Melbourne, perhaps the Shrine of Remembrance, and there would be an album particularly dedicated to this location?

An album or playlist specifically made for St.Kilda Beach, Dandenong ranges or The Twelve Apostles?

It is possible and in fact, Swedish band “John Moose” have done this themselves. John Moose describes their music to be a constant war between civilisation and nature, thus no better place to release their new album than in the woods. But how do you release music in the woods?

Geo-Tagging

Geo-tagging, we know, is a tool used to locate where consumers are and perhaps give them a reward for being in this location – i.e. Pokemon Go, or it can be most commonly used to promote a business’ location. Geo-tagging is not a fancy new innovation coming up in 2017, but it still has the potential to create meaningful content for your consumers.

Snapchat has recently released an AR (augmented reality) art exhibition on their new World Len’s feature. It features nine different locations around the world and at each location, there is an art installation by Jeff Koons.  It encourages consumers to visit the Sydney Opera House to find a cool 3D, AR art sculpture of Popeye.

popeye sailor man
source: https://lsn-staging.s3.wefew.io/filestorage/images/81250/screen-shot-2017-10-04-at-5-22-17-pm.png?width=818&height=460&quality=80&crop%5Bx%5D=0&crop%5By%5D=89&crop%5Bwidth%5D=1220&crop%5Bheight%5D=686&method=crop

Other innovations with Geo-tagging have been covered before, for example using geo-tagging to create location-based stories (everywhere you go becomes a museum of history) to opening numerous virtual pop up stores in the middle of the forest, or the beach. What the band John Moose did was create an app, that could geo-tag where the consumer was and once you were tagged to be within some type of forest, the music starts playing automatically!

source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQxaxhTkhl8&w=560&h=315

With Geo-tagging there are a plethora of opportunities to be discovered that perhaps will become more prevalent with the emerging innovations of augmented reality. With the release of the Oculus, Google AR headsets and AR innovations in our mobile phones pioneered by Apple and Samsung, there is no doubt AR marketing will be a common method of communication in the next five years. As digital marketers, we need to continue to look to the future and find ways on how to effectively utilise new technologies to create meaningful content for our consumers, and it seems that AR is a potential avenue for us to explore.

How do you think Geo-tagging could be used to add to a brand’s marketing campaign? Maybe you have seen a campaign yourself but could be further improved through geo-tagging, let me know in the comments below!

As always, stay woke!

 

 

 

 

Disney movies changed FOREVER?

Welcome back to part two of the emotional marketing series. I kicked it off last week with an exploration into why emotional marketing is important and the increased use of VR within marketing campaigns, which you can read here. 

This week we will be exploring AEI…

Artificial.

Emotional.

Intelligence.

Artificial emotional intelligence or as it’s known among IT scholars, affective computing, will revolutionise the way we live. Why?

With this tech, Disney could be able to change the ending of Beauty and The Beast in real time by simply assessing how each audience member reacts to certain scenes.

Imagine a world where Woody stays with Al (creepy toy collector) in Toy Story 2 and never goes back to Andy.

toystory
source: https://media.giphy.com/media/RgjV1x4VRGC4g/source.gif
woodygoodbye
source: https://media.giphy.com/media/fnwS4A9h4UYH6/giphy.gif

Goodbye childhood.

According to Josh Walker, more brands are increasingly taking note of this new technology that can scan our faces, read our emotions and predict our behaviour by our moods.

Although out of sarcasm, I talked about Google and Snapchat using social media to recreate George Orwell’s nineteen-eighty-four (coincidentally in the year of Disney remakes), it turns out we are probably already living in a surveillanced society.

With AEI tech being patented within the algorithms of Facebook and used for research within Disney movies; brands such as Audi, BMW and Heineken are also using AEI to their advantage.

Realeyes an emotion-tracking software allows companies to scan our faces as we watch those brand’s advertisements, particularly online, to effectively determine which advertisement generated the most amount of sales.

All well and good for future marketers like us to be able to use emotion-tracking software to create better content.

But how far is too far? 

In May 2017, Facebook was granted access for a patent that allows them to scan our typing behaviour so that they can analyse how we feel and then line our news feeds with advertisements that are associated with these emotions.

I personally don’t want Facebook to detect that I am having a quarter-life crisis and bombard me with fitness trials and local ice-cream deals. I will get fat and purchase the trials, and my money will be sucked into the vast vortex of useless, unused gym subscriptions. Whose fault is it? Facebook. It’s Facebook’s fault.

Can AEI be used for good?

I loved the way AEI has been used to capture the emotions of audiences while watching The Revenant, allowing marketers to see which parts the audience enjoyed and therefore they were able to strategically market those points.

the revenant AEI
source: https://www-lsnglobal-com.ezproxy.lib.monash.edu.au/opinion/article/21634/how-are-brands-tracking-emotions-to-improve-their-content

My question to you this week is how do you see the future of emotion-tracking software/AEI being applied to our daily lives and whether you would be comfortable with this change?

Let me know in the comments below and thank you for staying tuned for another week of emotional marketing. Stay woke out there!

Snapchat’s UnSnapped Potential

I know in the past two weeks everyone has been talking about Snapchat and the ways in which they are trying to introduce new ways to advertise on their platform. What interests me, however, is why Snapchat is fast-becoming the gold rush of the millennial age.

Yes. It is true that Snapchat, in terms of growth, are not doing so well. In fact, they missed their Q1 financial target by $158 million and took a net loss of more than $2.2 million. After the release of their Q2 financial report, you can see Snapchat has had another $2.6 million loss due to the failing of their shares. However, what was also interesting was that Snapchat reported an increase of 21% (173 million) in daily active users of their app, which is more than what Instagram can boast.

So the question is, if Snapchat users are increasing every quarter why are they dropping money like it’s hot?

-images-blog-infographics-Snapchat_Blog-RetailToday
source: https://forbusiness.snapchat.com/blog/why-shoppers-snap-when-they-shop

Well, the answer is that Snapchat holds too much control over what advertisers and companies can do on their app – talk about Kim Jung Un. Snapchat is a great platform full of untapped potential and great in many ways to reach into the mindsets of users under 25. Since we spend more time on Snapchat than we do sitting on the toilet, this is the platform worth a lot of time and effort to the right company.

We are so easily influenced by what we see our friends doing, buying, eating, drinking that Snapchatters are 55% more likely to buy things we don’t actually need than non-Snapchatters (those who don’t snap on the daily). It is also where the “early-adopters” are highly concentrated, as the platform compromises of millennials who actively try new things for the sake of it.

When you take all these things into consideration, from a marketer’s perspective this is where the gold is. While Snapchat shouldn’t free up their control to let advertisers do whatever they want (#YOLO, is that still a thing?), they should, however, allow more freedom for content creation to companies. This young audience Snapchat possesses, marketers just can’t reach through TV advertising, Facebook ads and Instagram altogether.

-images-blog-infographics-Snapchat_Blog-TV
source: https://forbusiness.snapchat.com/blog/meet-audience-you-wont-find-on-tv

If Snapchat is where it’s at, then shouldn’t we let the rest get in on it too? Or from a consumer point of view, are you done with ads altogether? Let me know your thoughts in the comments below!

 

featured image source:
Dynamic Snapchat Logo/Icon